Alienmorph wrote:At this point, I see things getting even WORSE, because if Biden is elected (which I hope to God he is, because the world really doesn't need another 5 years with the orange asshole in charge) then all the stunning and brave american (fake) liberals, which are totally not racist and bigoted because only white people can be racist and bigoted, will want to sanitize western culture even more, because they'll have to make sure that there is never going to be another Trump.
First - well, it might be a good occasion to redefine Western Culture. It's always seen as this big, rather monolithic block but it really is not.
The Witcher or the MCU are extremely different things, because they come from very different countries.
If the US part of the Western culture gets sanitized, well, a ton of other stuff will remain. It will be a good occasion to rediscover it. In some cases the accusations of "sanitization" make me laugh a bit though (for comic books in particular) because they are super sanitized, safe and calibrated to begin with compared to many other similar media. I like DC and Marvel but there's more philosophical depth and subtelty in ten random pages of Hugo Pratt's
Corto Maltese than in all the stories I've read of Batman, the X-Men or Ms Marvel.
Second - I often see a ton of white liberals calling for...let's say "rather inconsequential" changes to culture. When there is drama because something is called racist, sexist, or whatever else, whether it's true or false, you often find a ton of white Twitter users. For some reason, nonwhite liberals tend to focus on matters of slightly bigger importance - which is what I call the relationship between police and population, no matter what you think of Black Lives Matter; it's a bigger issue than pondering whether Gone with the Wind should be available on streaming without a Trigger Warning.
I assume that when you are liberal, but you are not subject to any injustice yourself, you just create your own causes, and they tend not to be as interesting.
The story I remember was last year's French cosplay champion who was supposed to participate in Eurocosplay but was denied entrance because her cosplay of a LoL character (some undead pirate whose name I don't remember) was considered blackface. Nevermind the fact that LoL is super cartoonish, that the character's ethnicity was not exactly obvious (and the setting is fantasy), and that she built a prosthetic for her cosplay - she did not actually blacken her face. In the end, I'm not sure I've seen a single black person being outraged at her - but a ton of white ones (successfully) called for her head and threatened her if she dared to show up.
Alienmorph wrote:Censorship, vandalism and historical revisionism are the DEFINITION of wrong answers. Your country was built over the sweat and blood of slaves, yet calls itself "the land of the free". There's no amount of breaking shit up that will undo or make that not true. Own your mistakes, make sure thei're never forgotten. Don't pretend all your faults magically disappear if you force people to not talk or think about them. That's why you leave stuff like Civil War generals statues where they are, not to celebrate them in a positive way.
Historical revisionism is not bad. It happens all the time. And statues are not here to remember your old dirty laundry - that's what memorials are for. Those particular statues were built to glorify the "lost cause", and it was very much done to remember the good old times when blacks weren't pestering whites with having rights or whatnot and were just sub-citizens.
I doubt Italy still has a ton of Mussolini statues, even if he definitely built some and it's part of the history of the country. Eastern Europe has lost most of its Stalin/Lenin statues too. The French Revolution caused an absolute carnage among statues of kings, with only a handful being spared (Henri IV mostly). And I won't even mention Germany.
And yet Italy remembers fascism, Eastern Europe sovietism, and France the monarchy. On top of that the U.S. have a rather short history, so removing some unsavory statues is unlikely to create a historical void. They'll still know about the Civil War.
Honestly, there is a huge difference between Bristol having a statue celebrating a guy who became filthy rich by packing Africans by the hundreds on his ships to trade them against sugar and cotton, or
Nantes having a memorial explaining how the city profited from the Triangle Trade, including the names of all the Nantais ships that sent a grand total of 500.000 people from Africa to America. They talk about the same trade, roughly, but the form of the message matters.