The response to the animated movie seem positive, and Sony is working on a sequel and a Spider-girls only spinoff. So I could see them being setting up Spiderverse as "the Sony Spiderman franchise" and keep Tom Holland's Spidey in the MCU.
But it's Sony. Thei're a bunch of greedy idiots. More so than the average Hollywood studio. So I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't realize the Venom movie sold only because of the sheer popularity of the character and the actor playing it, and decide they don't need to use the MCU as a crutch anymore. Especially with Amy Pascale and Avi Arad still in charge.
Raga wrote:As to the Captain Marvel reworking into only being female from the beginning thing. Does anybody really care about this? I have literally never met anybody who listed Captain Marvel on even their like top ten favorite superheros. If some superhero gets remade, it seems better to use some tertiary "Who the fuck is this guy?" hero rather than trying to shoe-in a female Thor or the like.
Well, the fact is that the original Captain Marvel is like the one superhero whos death was permanent, so he hasn't been around for ages, minus a couple fakes and other timelines dopplegangers, but back in the day he was a fairly major player. He was the one guy Thanos had any amount of respect for, despite him foiling his plans multiple times, that alone should say something. Still, it's not a gigantic problem per se. But given what's going on with the comics, both with the female Cap. Marvel and in general at Marvel, it's a change of story with some worrisome implications.
And funny you mentioned Female Thor. It's already been rumored they're gonna start doing the genderswapped heroes thing. Currently it seems like the first one could be Hawkeye, who might get a solo movie just to introduce his female replacement.